Magazine withdraws flawed study claiming that masks can harm children

Picture of the article titled

photo: Johannes Ezer/AFP (Getty Images)

recent paper The recommendation to wear a mask can be dangerous for children and has now been withdrawn.IThis is the second pandemic-related research written by the first author. After the other paper was retracted, it stopped publishing within a month. Claims indicate that the covid-19 vaccine will kill almost as many people as it has rescued.

The study is Publish A research letter published in JAMA Pediatrics on June 30, titled: “Experimental evaluation of carbon dioxide content in the air inhaled by healthy children with or without masks: a randomized clinical trial.” The main author is German clinical psychologist Harald Walach (Harald Walach).

Walach and his colleagues claimed that the carbon dioxide content in the blood of children wearing masks for only a few minutes was higher than safe levels. Take a breath again. Based on their and other studies, they further believe that “children should not be forced to wear masks.”

This study was quickly criticized for various reasons, including the use of potentially incorrect measuring equipment to measure the carbon dioxide level near the mask And lack of other relevant data, such as children’ssecond Actual blood oxygen level. To make matters worse, the JAMA study was published in the same week as Walach’s earlier paper on vaccine safety. Withdraw Similar data is sloppy, although only after fierce criticism from other scientists, including the editor of the journal that published the journal. Only two weeks later, Wallach’s second paper suffered the same fate.

“After publication, many scientific questions about research methods were raised,” the editor of the journal wrote In the retraction instructions that accompany the research now.Same as other paper, The authors had the opportunity to defend their case, but “did not provide enough convincing evidence to solve these problems.”

Walach’s misfortune, if you want to call it that way, you don’t just stop at these two studies. In the aftermath of the first withdrawal, PoWell-known universities in Poland termination Its affiliation with Walach states that vaccine research “misleadingly uses data to draw wrong conclusions and may cause public harm.”

Withdrawal is a healthy part of the scientific process, not always or even usually Show that the researcher fouled. But Wallach won as Unscientific crank Long before the pandemic, once Crowned In 2012, the Austrian Association for Critical Thinking was named Pseudo Scientist of the Year for its research on alternative medicine and telepathy. Therefore, it is curious how Walach, who seems to have no relevant experience in researching vaccines or masks, can publish these terrible studies in two different journals without any red flags.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *