The National Institutes of Health has increased spending on animal experiments conducted abroad by nearly a quarter in the past two years, sending cash abroad to make fish addicted to drugs and nicotine, and to feed human feces. Rodents, an analysis shows the animal protection group White coat waste project found it.
The agency reported that the agency spent approximately US$140.3 million on foreign animal research in fiscal year 2020, up from approximately US$114 million in 2018. The funds will be used for research in at least 29 other countries. The project aims to end All public funding for animal research. animal. Its founder and president, Anthony Bellotti, is a Republican strategist who previously opposed Obamacare and family planning.
The largest recipients of NIH funds in 2020 are institutions in rich countries. Institutions in Germany and Canada received the most taxpayer funds that year for animal testing. Other major grant recipients include entities in Australia, the Netherlands, Switzerland, South Africa, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Taiwan, and Ghana.
The goal of the project is to identify genes that may affect addiction and help identify individuals at risk of drug abuse. Since 2018, the project has received approximately US$1.1 million in NIH funding, including US$428,249 in 2020.
A recent other animal research project funded by NIH involves a $242,641 study that involved making pregnant rodents addicted to alcohol and causing “chronic unpredictable stress” in their babies to study the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure. University of British Columbia In Vancouver, Canada.
It also funded a $166,212 study to study the consequences of alcohol abuse by training rats to drink alcohol in the dark. Concepcion University In Chile.
McMaster University A researcher in Hamilton, Ontario received US$633,250 for the forced feeding of human feces from genetically modified mice and then measured their anxiety to explore the role of gut bacteria in anxiety and depression.
In Nigeria Lagos University In a study funded by USD 97,738 in 2020, pregnant mice were forced to eat a high-salt diet to study salt-sensitive hypertension.
NIH has also provided taxpayers’ money to China, and since 2015, the agency has provided more than US$500,000 to China. Wuhan Institute of Virology Study bats infected with coronavirus.
After the global COVID-19 pandemic, these experiments have recently been reviewed, and it is said that the Wuhan laboratory may be the origin of the health crisis.
“The National Institutes of Health sends tens of millions of dollars in taxes to animal testing laboratories and schools overseas. These countries do not need our money, such as the United Kingdom, or should not receive our money, such as China. Stop it,” Belotti of the White Coat Waste project told Zenger. “The National Institutes of Health’s foreign aid ranges from stupid to dangerous.”
But NIH and other scientists, which are affiliated with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said that such experiments are necessary to learn how to prevent, treat, and cure human diseases and to develop treatments and drugs.
“You really don’t know what will happen until you put the test compound into the living system,” Cindy Buckmaster, Chairman of the Board American medical progress, Tell Zenger. “Before we continue to use it in the human body, we need to know what this compound actually does in a complete living system.”
Buckmaster points out that this use of animals is not new.
“What are the treatments for animal research? The answer is: Which ones are not? Every treatment, vaccine, surgical intervention, diagnostic test, everything you know that you think is a very important medical convenience, is told to pass animal research, because All of this must start with an understanding of biological systems.”
Eva Masievsky, Director of Communications and Media Relations of the Biomedical Research Foundation, added that animal research and testing are “necessary for the development of safe and effective treatments and vaccines for humans, as well as the treatment and vaccination of our pets. .”
“Breakthroughs such as organ transplantation, blood transfusion, cancer treatment, nerve implants, influenza and coronavirus vaccines demonstrate the importance of animal research,” she told Zeng. “Will not develop and accept vaccines and treatments against COVID-19 Food and Drug Administration Not approved by laboratory animals. “
The National Institutes of Health says Said in the public statement: “For many reasons, we can study animals in a way that we cannot study humans. Animal research conducted in the laboratory allows scientists to control factors that may affect the results of experiments.”
“These strict controls allow for a more precise understanding of the biological factors at hand and provide greater certainty of experimental results when developing treatments.”
NIH also pointed out that in many cases, alternative test methods that do not involve live animals are used instead of live animals.
Many lawmakers– Republicans with Democratic Party Similar-Some veterinary experts criticized the costly and inhumane use of animal experiments, and urged the federal government to use alternative methods more frequently.
Some people have been putting pressure on NIH and other U.S. institutions to phase out domestic animal research and reduce funding to other countries because these tests do not always follow the same standards as U.S. laboratories.
“I have witnessed firsthand that federal regulators can’t even prevent waste and abuse in animal research and testing laboratories here in the U.S., so they can’t do it in a 7,000-mile facility abroad because they have no power and even less transparency,” Dr Jim KeeneA former animal research veterinarian who used to work in a federal government-funded laboratory, but now opposes testing and cooperates with the white coat waste project, told Zeng Ge.
“Taxpayers’ funding for foreign animal research raises serious concerns about animal welfare, transparency, and research oversight that the NIH has not adequately addressed,” added Keen, who recently served as a researcher for the Harvard Law School Animal Law and Policy Program.
Dr. Alka Chandna, Vice President of Laboratory Investigation Cases Pet Friendly Organization, Said that NIH funding can be granted to foreign facilities and American experimenters, who may conduct research in another country “no matter how cruel.”
“Animal experiments are always cruel and should end no matter where they occur. But animals in other countries may be tortured in ways that the United States would not do-even though our country’s animal protection laws are trivial,” Chandna told Zenger . “NIH-funded American experimenters are collaborating with foreign laboratories CIA Black websites used for torture. The U.S. government needs to modernize its research programs, recognize that animal experiments cannot cure humans, and stop dumping ethics and ethics in countries with zero animal protection. “
Pressure from legislators and experts, coupled with the Pew Research Center’s opinion survey, shows that most Americans, 52%The opposition to the use of animals in scientific research has led many departments to curtail these experiments in American facilities.
Last month, the Department of Veterans Affairs comfirmed In the past five years, it has reduced the number of dog experiments by 75%, which is the lowest point in more than a decade, and has reduced the number of cat studies by 70%. It will be completely phased out by 2025.
Passed by the House Appropriations Subcommittee on June 25 Vote to cancel funds All cat and dog experiments in Virginia.
Previously, the Ministry of Agriculture Ended all feline experiments In 2019, after receiving widespread criticism, he began adopting the remaining laboratory cats.
the member of Congress It is also committed to providing funds for foreign animal testing, and Senate Voting cancelled in May Taxpayers fund animal research in laboratories across China, including the Wuhan laboratory, which has been the focus of international attention because it may be the origin of COVID 19.
“When millions of taxpayers’ money is sent to dangerous biologics laboratories in China and other countries for dangerous experiments, multiple harmful experiments involving animals, the government’s huge expenditures get out of control,” Congressman Fred Keller (R-Pa).), Member of the Committee on Internal Affairs Oversight and Reform Co-sponsor a bill Cut funding for the Wuhan laboratory in the conference hall, told Zeng in a statement.
This story is provided by Newsweek Zenger News.